Prepare for the Certified Case Manager Test with targeted quizzes and expert content. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ace your exam and advance your career today!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Besides the court, which body completes a judicial review and how often?

  1. Child welfare committee twice a month

  2. Citizen's review panel every 15 days

  3. Citizen's review panel every 2 consecutive before judicial

  4. Community advisory board monthly

The correct answer is: Citizen's review panel every 2 consecutive before judicial

The choice indicating that a Citizen's review panel conducts reviews every two consecutive months before a judicial review is correct. This aligns with the established practices of many jurisdictions where citizen review panels play an essential role in overseeing child welfare cases. Their involvement typically consists of evaluating cases prior to court proceedings to ensure that children's best interests are being met and that all necessary services and interventions are in place. The practice of having a Citizen's review panel engaged in this manner serves to ensure a level of oversight and community involvement in the judicial process. This can facilitate a thorough examination of cases, providing recommendations that can ultimately benefit the case outcomes when they reach the court. Such panels usually focus on more comprehensive evaluations rather than frequent assessments, emphasizing quality and thoroughness. This contrasts with the other provided choices, which describe review frequencies or bodies that do not accurately reflect the established practices concerning judicial reviews. For example, having reviews occurring twice a month or every 15 days would be more intense than typical review schedules, and mentioning a community advisory board with different monthly frequencies does not align with the specialized focus of citizen panels as conduits for judicial preparation.